Listen To This Article: The Scooby Doo

according to Gigaohmbiological

Scroll to the bottom of the article for audio version!

There’s something very satisfying about solving a mystery. Have you noticed? You know, that light bulb moment, the AHA moment.

AHA!

Many people are convinced of the lab leak theory. It is so satisfying to be one of the people who has solved the mystery. Mystery solved guys, it was a lab leak. I thought so too, I was convinced of it because they were censoring it on social media. The evidence for it is quite extensive, for example, they had been working on coronaviruses for many years and there are many peer reviewed scientific papers on this work.

But, what if this is just another angle that is working for the system? What if there’s more to the story?

Are you just done? Are you rubbing your hands together, saying to yourself “well done Sherlock, you’ve solved the mystery” and so now, it’s time for these people to be locked up for their crimes. Maybe, that’s what these criminals want us to do. Could it be that we have been scooby dooed?

This meme needs work

Questions raised by J.J. Couey on his Twitch show:

1. If they lie to us about all this other stuff why wouldn’t they lie about this too?

2. Why wouldn’t they lie about the specificity of the test? (in other words, when you tested positive for COVID, was it really COVID, or was the test designed to make you feel more certain that it was COVID?)

3. Why wouldn’t they lie about a few sequences? ( in other words when they tell you there is a new variant, how do we know that it truly is a new variant and not just what always happens with RNA? RNA mutates easily)

4. Do you really believe that they would not lie about the virus?

We are expected to believe that this was a “novel” pathogen, the lab leak theory backs this idea up very nicely. We are not supposed to question that it was “novel” or “dangerous.”

We are not supposed to point out that the protocols used, like Remdesivir, Midazolam, and ventilators contributed to how dangerous having a cold suddenly became.

We are not supposed to point out that it was recommended to not offer antibiotics for “COVID” pneumonia contributing to how dangerous having a cold suddenly became.

We are not supposed to point out that the recommendation to stay at home alone, without any symptoms (asymptomatic) is harmful to mental health, and therefore contributed to how dangerous having a cold suddenly became.

We are supposed to be convinced that the mad scientists in labs are super smart, and they are, but, does this mean that they were able to create a “novel” virus, that requires completely “novel” measures, like censorship, and authoritarianism. Wait a minute, is censorship and authoritarianism “novel?”

We are supposed to be convinced that everyone should be pressured to take a brand new biological product, a genetic therapy, the mRNA injections, to save lives. But this brand new product, was not really so brand new after-all. It was never widely released to the market, after more than 20 years of studies, because those studies showed it to be toxic.

J.J. Cooey says that this is the scooby doo, the idea that this is a “novel” and “dangerous” virus. It is a lie, this was not a “novel” and “dangerous” virus in the way we have been led to believe. He suggests that they had a plan to use a non-specific test, in other words, a test that would give a positive result, but that positive result could have been for any coronavirus, or even could have a positive result, if you had orange juice for breakfast. He says by creating financial incentives to test people, a large portion of all-cause mortality could be rebranded as mortality caused by a brand new disease.

All-cause mortality is known as deaths from any cause. So, if someone died of a heart attack, and also tested positive with the non specific test, that death could be attributed to COVID.

This allowed the “novel” virus to become a national security priority.

He says that it was likely that an RNA infectious clone could have been a culprit at some point early on, and perhaps on other occasions. But to say that this started in 2020 and continues to this day is what he disputes.

He believes that it may have started with an RNA infectious clone. As he describes it “a self replicating” RNA molecule that could be dispersed. He says that if it was released in a high enough quantity, it could be spread, but the spread is limited and the life-span is limited because of the infidelity of RNA replication.

Mainly, the point is that this method of release could not sustain a pandemic for 3 years going on 4 now. But by using non specific tests, the perception of a never ending COVID pandemic can be maintained.

He is saying that while Gain of Function is being conducted, it is not really capable of sustaining a pandemic that would last for this long, or travel around the world, going on and on, like the energizer bunny for forever.

This is a mythology, and the purpose is to make sure that everybody believes that Gain of Function is a real threat, so that they, the criminals, can invert the sovereignty of our children into a permissions system, based on digital ID.

it’s about the next generation

.

Unfortunately, this means that many of the people who are considered to be hero’s, by many of us, may have been co-opted to present the other side of what appeared to be a debate. The debate over the origin of COVID. But if COVID wasn’t actually the threat we were led to believe that it was, then a debate over the origin is not exactly the way to go, if we want to break free from a lie. This debate just takes us back to the original idea, that this was a “novel” and “dangerous” virus, and that lockdowns, censorship, testing, and mandates were the right thing to do.

illusion of consensus