How to Be Ethical According to the WHO
How to Be Ethical According to the WHO
Extreme Forced Oxygen - Part 2 - The latest and greatest treatment for respiratory viruses
If you want a background See Part 1 - Twitter Used to Sell Devices And ...
See Footnotes for information regarding my opinion of COVID12
I looked at 2 research papers from 2023 on the topic of High Flow Nasal Therapy.
One of the papers was published by the WHO3, and the other one was published in the Annals of Intensive Care.
In this post I will be discussing the WHO paper. The post would be too long if I talked about the other paper. So I will post about that in Part 3.
Here are some highlights from the WHO research paper:
“Oxygen has been listed on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines List and Essential Medicines List for Children for almost two decades.”
“data on the status of oxygen systems, their use and implications of oxygen therapy on patients in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs) remain lacking.”
“The master protocol serves to describe an observational cohort study from June 2021 through June 2023 that will be implemented in 30 countries representing four LMICs from each of the six WHO regions, and targeting up to four hospitals per country.”
“To maximise statistical power, we aim to recruit as many participants as possible.”
“To minimise selection bias, the following are introduced: … and ► Waiver of informed consent (see ethical considerations)
“WHO Ad Hoc COVID-19 Research Ethics Review Committee (CERC.0040) has approved this global protocol.”
“One, the research would not be feasible or practicable to carry out if informed consent were required.”
“As well, by virtue of their illness, patients are often unable to provide first-party consent, and third-party consent is challenging because of restrictions on visiting.”
My thoughts on this:
The WHO paper explains the widespread use of this therapy as standard care, while also being subject to numerous effectiveness studies.
The WHO initiated many studies on HFNO because it was imperative to determine more information on the use and implication of oxygen therapy for respiratory viruses.
Informed consent is unethical according to the WHO.
Keeping family away from their suffering loved ones creates an opportunity to conduct studies on people without having to get informed consent.
When a person is not able to talk or is put to sleep, they will not be able to give informed consent, and this will give more opportunities to do important studies on the use of HFNO for respiratory viruses. Many sedatives may be helpful to put the person to sleep so they can be a part of these important studies.
Having more low and middle income countries may be good for science™ as we can make declarations about how we are ethical people when we do not have informed consent to find the results that we are looking for in our research.
🤔
In the next article I will review the paper I mentioned which was published in The Annals of Intensive Care.
In my opinion the tests are completely unreliable. I have many doubts about the entire event. Was there a novel deadly virus? Or was there just many lies corruption and abuse? There was never any reason to take a test - cases were simply used to take rights away from us.
from the paper: “the three primary causes of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and after) the Covid period are:
Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes
Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics)
COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the same populations”
WHO O2CoV2: oxygen requirements and respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 in low-and-middle income countries—protocol for a multicountry, prospective, observational cohort study
copy paste to view: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/8/e071346.long
"For a while, the hospital allowed COVID-19 patients to receive a visit from a family member only if the patient agreed to be put on “comfort care. Once you’re put on comfort care, life-saving measures are slowly withdrawn and the patient dies within minutes to hours — and these patients were submitting to this … a lot of these patients I know would have survived, but they wanted so badly to see a family member that they would submit to kind of being euthanized.” (Mark Bishofsky, Respiratory Therapist)
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/patients-ventilators-killed-thousands-covid-patients/
Those scoundrels!
Leslie