COVID - Novel and Dangerous, or Scam
Prior to COVID there was urgency surrounding how to roll out mRNA technology, Rick Bright called for an "entity of excitement"
In a previous post I provided a paraphrased transcript from an interview between Jonathan Couey and Scott Schara. Scott Schara shared the story of his daughter Grace, who died in the hospital with COVID. After her death, he requested the hospital records and spent around a hundred hours going through these records with a friend of the family who is also a doctor. After going over the records it became clear to Scott and his friend that the protocols that were used on Grace killed her.
He approached the hospital in an effort to help them not repeat these mistakes again with other patients. They did not want to speak with him. It was only a year later that he came to the conclusion that his daughter was in fact murdered.
Why would the hospital want to murder patients? The reason is the C.A.R.E.S act. Under the Cares act, in the US, each hospital received financial incentives for using ventilators on their COVID patients, or for a COVID death.
I am going to say this really loud.
HOW DANGEROUS WAS COVID?
PROTOCOLS used in the hospitals killed people.
THE MURDER OF PATIENTS was INCENTIVISED for patients WHO TESTED POSITIVE FOR COVID.
I don’t think people are hearing this very well, because they are very concerned about Gain of Function, but what should be at the top of their mind after hearing stories like this is that:
GAIN OF FUNCTION IS A RED HERRING!
GAIN of FUNCTION IS A DISTRACTION!
THEY MURDERED PEOPLE IN THE HOSPITAL SO THAT THEY COULD JUSTIFY THE ROLLOUT OF mRNA TECHNOLOGY!
CAN YOU HEAR ME?
Sorry for yelling. I will be writing more about this interview, but that is all for now. Thanks for reading!
One more thing.
My father had a stroke (7) years ago and has had trouble breathing since damage to the vocal cord area (not badly, but uses a CPAP). He had Kidney Stones and needed to get them removed, this was in 2021.
He went to the hospital where they tested him for COVID, before his procedure, he was negative. He then goes through the procedure and has trouble coming off the anesthesia.
He was having "breathing difficulties." So, they test him for COVID again, as part of the their protocol, and then claim he’s POSITIVE! He was tested (5) hours earlier and he was negative. You can’t become ill with symptoms in (5) hours!
I was out of state at the time. I told him to get the hell out of the hospital! Because they were going to blame his breathing trouble on COVID. I told him to sign out AMA (Against Medical Advise) I'm so glad he listened to me. He got out and is doing fine now. He never had COVID. They were trying to cash in on him, because he has a lot of other comorbidities, and his death would be easy to disguise as COVID related.
Had he NOT gotten out AMA, it most likely would have resulted in his death.
You're right!
1.) The manufacturer(s) own trial data show that there were risks of very serious side effects. Historical data, related mRNA gene therapy development, reflect this as well. Not only that, there were problems with the method of action. What magic occurred in less than 9 months to change the entire mRNA method of action? Nothing, because cellular mechanics haven't changed.
2.) The "authorities" FDA, CDC, and vaccine manufacturers admit that they don't know the possible long-term side effects of the "vaccines" How could they, it hasn't been long enough. However, when possible side effects are mentioned, they always claim that they can't be vaccine related. You can't have it both ways. You can't claim not to know what could happen, then in the same breath, know what is *not* happening. That's not science, that's a Monty Python sketch!
3.) There was an information suppression campaign. This is not a conspiracy "theory" the Twitter Files released my Musk prove this. Facebook even blocked content and links to Pfizer's official website. Why? Because the data proved that there were serious questions as to safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. Factual data was at odds with "official guidance."
4.) All alternative treatments were immediately banned. Not only that, there was a push by the NIH/NIAID to block research into alternatives to the vaccines. Vaccines are usually years out, before development and testing are completed. It makes no logical sense to *not* triage. Try immediate treatments first, because a vaccine would normally be years away. There's only a few possible reasons for this, 1.) This was planned, and the government authorities weren't really worried about COVID deaths. 2.) They didn't care about saving lives. It was always about mRNA technology approval. 3.) This is about population reduction through increasing sterilization and other genetic diseases.
5.) The COVID death statistics are completely and totally false. The CDC generated shoddy COVID death data. They admitted to adding died "with" COVID and died "from" COVID in their statistics. Why? If they truly wanted to count COVID deaths, you would never do that. Which again leads to; they were never truly interested in "knowing" true COVID death statistics. This is provable because the CDC's COVID infection fatality ratio data are correct. That being the case, COVID, being on par with the Flu can't cause the deaths of 5-times-more people! Oops, they forgot that people know how to convert ratios to percentages.
6.) The entire COVID response has been illogical at every turn. The lockdowns were the first clue. Once the virus was literally everywhere -- before anyone even knew to look for it, what good could a quarantine do? Why are there no lockdowns for the Flu? The Flu has the same infection fatality ratio as COVID, and we also don't know when or where the Flu starts each year.
7.) I'm from the government, and I'm here to help...
You might also find this article interesting. There is a paper on the NIH website from April 24, 2019 listing all of the issues encountered with mRNA tech. This was LONG before anything COVID-19 was even on the horizon.
https://ogre.substack.com/p/conspiracy-theorists-advocate-3-covid