Only Praise Allowed for Genomic Sequencing

Anabel works for who?!?

Recently in a highly popular post on Substack, Robert Malone raised inquiries regarding a Twitter account associated with the name Anabel.¹

Note that “Anabel” - the person pushing this meme - has created 4,326 posts with no profile or profile photos, and only 58 following and 165 followers. Reality bites when you are a bot.

Was this paid for by Pfizer (or maybe Moderna or ???)?

Within the same post, he included an image portraying Elon Musk alongside the caption:

"You are the media now!"

This has spurred me to delve deeper into the query posed by R.M. because... I am the media!

I have scrutinized numerous tweets by Anabel - the links to which are provided in the footnotes section.²³⁴⁵⁶

However, I aim to keep this discourse as concise as feasible, acknowledging your busy schedule!

Let us focus solely on Anabel's pinned tweet, and my incapacity to engage with it. (Link to Youtube video of my attempt to like it provided in the footnotes)⁷

Now, let us dissect the essence of the tweet.

It seems that she is expressing doubt regarding the accuracy and assertions surrounding genomic sequencing.

Do you reckon that pharmaceutical companies, who were keen on advancing mRNA technology for prospective genetic treatments - also known as “precision medicine” - would enlist individuals of this nature?

After amassing substantial profits, wouldn't they furnish these “trolls”, “chaos agents” and “abusers” with a Twitter account that permits individuals like myself to engage with the content?

Moreover, it is common knowledge that Elon Musk harbors a strong affinity for mRNA technology. (Footnote referencing Musk's tweets about mRNA included)⁸

1. Friday Funnies November 15th 2024

2. In the same way that the federal reserve aims to move markets without actually doing anything using 'forward guidance', so does modern science aim to convey significance using carefully crafted endpoints and p-values that avoid accounting for complexity.

3. "Governments can’t even mend potholes.” The slyest trick they ever pulled was convincing you of government ineptitude, for no entity this inept could ever execute a conspiracy. Don't ascribe to stupidity, that which can be sufficiently explained by malice.

4. Exogenous appearance of a sequence from one species in another isn't evidence of 'spread' - it's evidence of contact and/or proximity. There is zero biological precedent for it. You may as well claim that breathing in pollen risks uncontrolled viral replication of floral RNA/DNA.

5. I have a pandemic of Toyota Corollas in my city. - Corollas occur worldwide and over a wide area - Corollas are imported across international boundaries - A large number of people own Corollas in my city, thus are affected by it. Not sure if Corollas are severe. Should I worry?

6. When you tune your radio to a particular frequency and you hear a voice, did that voice emerge naturally, or was it created by the radio? Neither. The voice was always there in the ether, you just couldn't hear it until you tuned the antenna to the right channel.

7. Anabel’s Tweet

8. Elon Is Pretty Excited About the Incredible Potential of mRNA